
OK, so here's
a guy who just got sentenced to three years in prison for having sex with a horse. This is South Carolina, USA.
So what issues come up here? Well, of course there are the animal's rights.Presumably the animal didn't give consent. But on the other hand, it's actually legal to kill a horse--or any other animal--without its consent. And eating animals is legal too. So why the focus on having sex with an animal? Presumably because of what it says about the person who would do that.
So is having sex with an animal worth three years in prison? If you read the article, you'll see that the perpetrator is a 50-year-old black man with a history of mental illness--do we think that it's a coincidence that no one else has been charged with having sex with an animal in several years? So is there an issue of unequal enforcement of the law? Is there the possibility of racial discrimination, age discrimination, sex discrimination, discrimination on the basis of mental health? According to Kinsey, it's actually pretty common for people to have sex with animals, so why don't we read about this kind of thing more often?
And even if the law were enforced equally, is it possible that a sentence of three years is a cruel and unusual punishment?